In What Ways Has California's 2011 Redistricting Process and the Open Essay

In What Ways Has Californias 2011 Redistricting Process and the Open Primary Election Changed the States Political System - Essay ExampleMoreover, the decision to hold elemental elections will further intensify the situation as the position of the influential incumbents dominant in the Congress for years is at stake. Also, in the afterwardsmath of the redistricting action some of the incumbents will be forced to retire however in other case, incumbents will be running against each other for elections, thus the free primaries would be significant in this context. In this case, it is being expected that the extreme Republicans or even Democrats will be replaced by new and neutral candidates by virtue of the open primaries, thus about a quarter of the seats owned by California in the Congress will be replaced by new candidates who wouldnt have experienced the military operation before. To elaborate on the effects of the redistricting process, it is crucial to highlight the signific ance of redistricting to analyze the cut offs and implications of the process in California. The process of redistricting relates to the congressional completelyocation of seats to the creation of U.S. There are basically 435 seats whereby all seats have been uniformly distributed amongst the entire population of the U.S. However, the population census and the demographics keep changing with time, and thus they have to be re-analyzed with time to come up with fair allocation of congressional seats to the entire population, thus, after every 10 years the government goes through the process of redistricting based on the changes in population demographics of the U.S. California is one of the most populous rural area of U.S with 53 representatives assigned to this state alone. Historically, when redistricting took place it had no effect at all, and there was just a change in one of the seats which was swapped in the midst of the seats as a result of the primaries. Gerrymandering is one of the ways how the incumbents influence the redistricting process to avail the best chances to secure their positions, by changing the inclinations of the maps in such(prenominal) a way that the maximum number of voters base is covered in the areas representing their districts. This results in the distorted figure of the maps that are produced after the gerrymandering process. The redistricting process held in 2011 was thusly a unique one as an effort was made to appoint neutral members for the purpose. In case of California as well, 14 members were appointed all of whom werent seasoned politicians or incumbents, rather amateurs which suggests that the chances of political point scoring or distortion of results was near to impossible. For this reason, many of the congressmen seemed unhappy with the decision. When you go from a governing body that allows incumbents to draw districts that favor themselves to one that disallows considering incumbents at all, youre bound to have some incumbents paired together and some open districts, suggests Tom Bonier whos the adviser for Democrats redistricting process. This implies that if the issue of incumbency is not taken into account, chances are that multiple incumbents will end up running for the seat in the same district. Some of the general trends which emerged or are expected to emerge in the future can conveniently be traced after an analysis is conducted over